[Zacodaxe2]

Kind of ridiculous to pay extra on top of a subscription. There’s also controversy surrounding the recent film. Do you think it’s worth it to see it now versus waiting a year later?

[dakineguy666]

Yeah $30 is pretty steep, more than you would probably pay in theatres even (unless you have more than 1 kid in tow). I doesn't really appeal to me, but my gf wanted to see it until she saw it's $30. It has been funny seeing all the people griping about having paid for the movie facebook though.

[Usernamenottaken]

Yeah I get paying that much for a room of people having a movie night but that's exactly the kind of experience I don't have these days.

A friend of mine with a gaggle of kids had a goos time, for what it's worth

[35for35]

$30 to stream a movie is absurd but surely someone recorded their screen and uploaded to a torrent somewhere? Not interested in the movie myself but this screams for piracy to happen.

[herbderb99]

It is ridiculous, but there will always be people who don't care about the fees.

[seventhveil7]

tempted to...

[blackacid]

With everything on the internet for free I'm surprised that someone would pay 30 dollars on top of a subscription fee for watch this.

[spammingf]

30 dollars is a ridiculous price

[Hellofello10]

I did not there are plenty of alternatives

[momiro pan]

Apparently it was the most pirated movie this week.

[rampage1001]

Heck no. I already pay for Disney+ why would I want to pay 30 bucks to see a movie that's going to come to stream in 2 months. Also there's alternative to watch it anyway

[Han999]

Me but I really don’t recommended not so great movie for using that fee.

[gogo24]

I paid for it, and it was definitely not worth the money... especially considering how it butchered the original

[ranzosavage]

This movie is definitely not worth $30.